The North American Technate

 

The 1930s Map That Explains Today's Chaos: 4 Takeaways You Weren't Meant to See

Recent headlines have presented a dizzying array of seemingly disconnected geopolitical events. In a matter of weeks, we have seen the U.S. capture Venezuela’s president after he was filmed taunting, "Come get me," the seizure of Russian "ghost fleet" oil tankers, a renewed push to purchase Greenland, and escalating tensions with Mexico. The sheer volume and speed of these developments can make the world feel chaotic and unpredictable.

But what if these events are not as random as they appear? What if they are connected by a nearly century-old, largely forgotten blueprint for North American consolidation? The key to unscrambling today's chaos might not lie in the latest breaking news, but on a map drawn in the 1930s that seems to be unfolding in real-time.

1. Today’s Foreign Policy Is Echoing a Forgotten "Technate" Blueprint

A concept that emerged from the Technocracy movement of the 1930s was the "North American Technate," a detailed blueprint for a new, continent-spanning society. This plan proposed the unification of the United States, Canada, Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, parts of South America, and Greenland. The vision was to combine Canada's vast mineral and hydroelectric resources with the industrial and agricultural power of the U.S. into a single, massive nation stretching from the North Pole to the equator.

The striking feature of this historical map is its direct overlap with today's foreign policy hotspots. The very countries and territories central to the Technate plan are now, nearly a century later, at the center of U.S. geopolitical actions and discussions. Recent events have put a sharp focus on Venezuela, Mexico, Canada, Cuba, and Greenland—all key components of the original Technate map. As one analysis bluntly puts it, once the U.S. has Greenland, "Canada will be surrounded on all sides might as well just join the United States at that point as America's hat."

This geographical echo is too precise to ignore. It reframes what appear to be separate, isolated crises—an intervention in South America, cartel tensions on the southern border, and an arctic acquisition—as potentially interconnected moves within a much larger, long-term continental strategy.

2. The Endgame Isn't Just Territory, It's a New Kind of Society

The Technocracy movement was not merely a plan for redrawing borders; it was a radical social and political ideology aimed at completely replacing the existing system. Its core tenets were explicitly anti-democratic and anti-capitalist. The movement's founders argued that in an advanced industrial age, society should not be run by elected politicians but by a small, unelected group of highly trained technical experts and scientists.

Under this system, money would be abolished and replaced with a new economic model based on "energy accounting." Every citizen would be issued non-transferable "energy credits" on a certificate. When a person purchased goods or services, the energy cost of production would be deducted from their account. Because these credits could not be sold, traded, or saved, the system was designed to prevent the accumulation of wealth and enforce economic equality.

The trade-off at the heart of the Technocratic vision was stark. The initial pitch promised immense leisure—that "the average workday for an individual would exceed no more than two hours"—in exchange for a complete surrender of personal liberty. A 1933 analysis of the movement summarized the proposition this way:

"If you hand over complete control of the business system to us we will give every citizen a living wage for life in return for 4 hours of work a day 4 days a week 10 months a year between the ages of 25 and 45 in reality the bait is on a hook the probable surrender of personal liberty by the average man in order for that small group of scientists to receive absolute power over life and death over this nation."

This historical ideology forces a modern reckoning, posing a central, uncomfortable question for our time: how can a constitutional republic with all of its flaws work effectively in a world where science and technology dominate?

3. A Tech Billionaire's Surprising Family Connection

A direct and surprising family line connects the original Technocracy movement to one of today's most influential technology figures: Elon Musk. His maternal grandfather, Joshua Holderman, was a prominent leader of Canada's Technocracy movement, serving in that role from 1936 to 1941.

Holderman actively promoted the vision of a North American Technate run by experts. His activism led to his brief arrest in 1940 after the Canadian government banned the movement for its opposition to Canada's involvement in World War II. After the movement's decline, he and his wife, who were supporters of apartheid, moved the family to South Africa in the 1950s. There, in a bizarre chapter of his life, Holderman and his family spent a decade roaming the Kalahari desert in a small plane, searching for a fabled lost city. He died in 1974 in a plane crash.

The parallels between the grandfather's ideology and his grandson's modern-day platform are notable. Elon Musk has repeatedly warned that automation will lead to mass unemployment, echoing the core premise of the original Technocracy movement. He has voiced support for a guaranteed basic income and, through his influence over the Trump administration—earning him the title "President Musk"—was appointed to head a new "Department of Government Efficiency (Doge)." This role is not a standard cabinet position but a unique station of influence, mirroring the fundamental technocratic belief that inefficient government should be run by experts who can implement technological fixes for societal problems.

4. This Isn't the End of Globalism—It's the Next Stage

A counter-intuitive interpretation of current world events argues that we are not witnessing the collapse of the "globalist world order." Instead, we are seeing a "controlled demolition" of the current system, because "if the status quo is not dismantled... then what you want to replace it with can't replace it." The objective is not to return to independent nation-states but to advance to the next stage of a long-term plan orchestrated by a "global cult."

This next stage involves breaking the world into controlled hemispheric blocs, a structure that aligns with both the North American Technate map and the geopolitical landscape described in George Orwell's 1984. In this view, the idea that political figures are making decisions is "ludicrous"; they are not independent actors but are effectively "gophers" implementing a pre-written agenda.

"And if we don't recognize that we can fall and so many have We can fall for the illusion that Donald Trump is breaking up the world order Yes he is as a gopher."

While these emerging blocs—one in the Americas, others dominated by Europe, Russia, or China—may appear to be in conflict over hemispheric control, they are in complete agreement on the ultimate goal. The endgame is the global implementation of an AI-driven digital control system, complete with digital IDs and digital currencies, that will centralize power and effectively eliminate individual freedom.

Conclusion: A Future Already Written?

The seemingly chaotic events shaping the Western Hemisphere may not be random acts of history but the deliberate execution of a long-established script. The 1930s Technate map provides a stunningly relevant framework for understanding the consolidation of North America, the ideological currents in Silicon Valley, and the larger global restructuring underway. This perspective suggests that we are not just witnessing history, but watching a pre-designed plan unfold.

This raises a crucial question for every citizen. In a world where century-old plans appear to be unfolding in real-time, how do we have a say in a future that may have already been designed behind closed doors?